"Despite their sometimes-menacing appearance and 'man-eating' reputation, sharks seldom cause harm when interacting with humans. The presence of some shark species as ‘apex predators' – occupying the very top level of the food web – is actually an indication of a healthy marine environment."
For a while, the hopes of all opposed to the WA shark cull hinged on the indication that the Environmental Protection Authoriy (EPA) of WA would assess the shark cull and potentially overturn the policy. However, on the 12th March the EPA announced that they would not assess the shark cull as they believed the cull was not likely to significantly impact the environment.
Since the cull began over 100 sharks have been caught. The policy of the government is to release any shark smaller than 3m and to destroy any shark which is one of the 3 target species and over 3m long; so far over 30 sharks being destroyed and 14 found dead on the line. The species which has been caught with an overwhelming frequency is the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier).
![]() |
| A female tiger shark which was destroyed as part of the policy. Photo credit: Bruce the Rib, Sea Shepherd (c) Jodi Hayes |
In a recent press release, fisheries minister Ken Baston stated: "“We have caught and destroyed a number of large sharks within one kilometre of selected beaches, at a time of year when our beaches are crowded. This catch data proves there are a large number of big sharks near these beaches". He also commended the program, saying that the methods were "working well".
This cull has brought to light the fact that large, tiger sharks frequent the inshore waters around WA and some of the most popular beaches...yet according to the Australian Shark Attack File there was only a single fatality from shark attacks in WA in 2013, and 2 in the previous year. Whilst any loss of life is an incredibly tragic event, it is hard to imagine that these low numbers really warrant such an expensive, controversial and damaging policy as the one Colin Barnett has implemented in WA with his shark cull.
However, there could be hope for the future. There is a limit on how long the drum lines may remain in the water and the EPA has stated they expected that "a continuation of the proposal beyond April 30 2014 would be referred for consideration".
